Search results

1 – 1 of 1
Article
Publication date: 1 April 2006

Cheryl Henderson‐Smart, Tracey Winning, Tania Gerzina, Shalinie King and Sarah Hyde

To develop a method for benchmarking teaching and learning in response to an institutional need to validate a new program in Dentistry at the University of Sydney, Australia.

3437

Abstract

Purpose

To develop a method for benchmarking teaching and learning in response to an institutional need to validate a new program in Dentistry at the University of Sydney, Australia.

Design/methodology/approach

After a collaborative partner, University of Adelaide, was identified, the areas of teaching and learning to be benchmarked, PBL approach and assessment, were established. A list of quality indicators for these aspects of teaching and learning were first developed conceptually and then validated by the literature. Then, using a quality enhancement framework, levels of achievement for each indicator were developed.

Findings

The findings are represented as a set of tables. These were mutually developed with the benchmarking partner and represent an agreed model for a benchmarking project to progress to the next stages of implementation and evaluation.

Practical implications

This model can be adapted for any benchmarking project in all levels of education; primary, secondary, tertiary and continuing.

Originality/value

The issue of benchmarking is high on the educational agenda, especially in higher education. The literature reports on a number of projects but with no clear explanation of a method for benchmarking. The fact that this model is evidence‐based in its approach and that it focuses on learning and teaching, also marks it as original and a significant development in this area.

Details

Quality Assurance in Education, vol. 14 no. 2
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0968-4883

Keywords

1 – 1 of 1